New Third Wave Arguments

-Threaten Russia CP--Human Rights
-Soft Power DA--heg bad and demo promo bad (only with K impacts for demo promo bad)
-For Japan Futenma Aff--Shimoji Disad (quid pro quo for leaving Futenma) and Shimoji Condition CP (Shimoji basing good)
-Updating previous neg files
-Russia fill-in DA against Afghanistan COIN affs - impact is likely to be that it provokes conflict with the US and upsets US/India relations
-Nietzsche K - will actually be done for this wave. It's mostly just a more out-there version of Security but has the Nietzsche component.

South Korea Cites

HO Neg arguments

New off-case positions

Nietzsche K - much more likely to be just some new Nietzsche cards that will be added to the security K
Obama: SK FTA (potentially both directions)

potentially generally applicable CPs:
Threaten Russia (not sure what we'll threaten them over yet)
condition CP for China - potentially condition on them reducing missile sales

Arguments in case negatives

Coercion
withdrawal costs more money

Turkey TNWs
- Consult NATO
- T - weapons do not military presence
- More work on allied prolif
- Water war security links
- Politics links- unpopular/popular

Afghanistan nation-building bad
- Jirga CP (support a jirga to re-direct US nation-building)
- Taliban Negotiations DA
- Russia Relations DA
- Security Links/blocks
- updating the afghanistan ptx da
- threaten Russia CP (maybe. What we would threaten them about is undecided)

Japan policy
China Advantage CP (something along the lines of engaging in a " North Pacific Regional Energy Consortium" with Japan & China)
US-Japan Alliance CP (still unsure what this will be)
T - Substantially = more than 50%
T - In = throughout
Compensation DA - more link and IL work, and looking for another impact scenario other than the F-22

PMCs
T - PMC not military presence
CP to regulate PMCs, not eliminate them.

Afghanistan drones
T - Reduce not Eliminate
T - weapons aren't presence
T - covert operations aren't presence (maybe)
T-drones aren't military presence (part of CIA)
Drones good - terrorism
Court Stripping
Cite but dont rule on ILAW CP (court stripping net benefit)
Pakistan relations CP (disclose drones exist)
Limit but don't remove drones CP - force multiplier/ban attacks
Congress CP (NB: reverse politics?)

South Korea policy
CP to remove nearly all troops - solves NK advantage better
Pan K (China threat)

Offshore balancing
CP's- economic engagement w/ NK - solves NK nukes
Case offense (heg good, basically):
NK war turns
Asia war turns
Taiwan war turns
China war turns
heg turns

South Korea prostitution
CP to regulate prostitution but not remove troops

Japan critique aff
CP:Accept terms of renegotiation of SOFA giving japan jurisdiction over bases while decentralizing futenma base to smaller islands
NB- U.S. Japan Alliance
East Asia stability
Gender K links/case turns
Essentialism turns
Marginalization turns

Kuwait
C.P. saying the U.S. should coop. with Kuwait instead of withdrawal
Withdrawal detrimental to Kuwait security
links for Israel DA

Iraq critique aff
Re-deployment Afghanistan/Pakistan/Iran
Counter plan: The U.S.F.G. should remove all troops accept those that promote development for Iraq as an independent nation
Topicality: T. Combat Troops

Afghanistan counter-narcotics
CP of stop doing counternarcotiic but not withdraw the troops
Nation building key to rural devlopment, and rural devlopment is their solvency
Politics links
T - not substantial

Iraq policy
Kurds DA
Israel DA
CP - Diplomatic talks with Iran
CP - Invest in Iraq infrastructure
CP - to leave 30,00 troops to Iraq (Net Benefit- Israel Stability DA)
T SOFA - must be substantial decrease against current planned presence